Submission period is now closed. (6 July 2026) Thank you to those who placed their feedback.
(August 2026 - Outline proposal due to Government . This is not a final decision on structure)
Thank you to everyone who contributed to Phase One of the West Coast Local Government Head Start Project. Your feedback has helped identify what matters most to our communities. This summary reflects feedback from 196 submissions and community drop-in sessions accross the Coast. View the key themes, priorities and perpectives shared, and how they will help inform the next stage of this important conversation. View by clicking here or access the the full report within the documents folder.
Starting the conversation about the future of local government on the West Coast
Reform is coming. The Coast needs a voice.
Councils have been given a choice:
- Develop a locally led proposal through the Head Start pathway or
- Move into a Central Government- led backstop process.
For the West Coast, this is our opportunity to help shape what happens next.
Coast leaders want to know: what do you think would work best for the West Coast?
Potential scenarios
To help you understand the types of pathways that could be considered, the trade-offs involved, and the issues that would need to be tested in more detail. These are not final decisions. They are starting points for discussion.
Scenario A: One Council for the Coast, an amalgamated unitary authority.

| POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES | QUESTIONS TO TEST |
| Simplifies governance by creating one council for the coast. | How would local voice be protected across Buller, Grey, Westland and smaller communities? |
| Could improve regional planning, infrastructure coordination and service delivery alignment. | What local boards, community boards or local leadership arrangements would be needed? |
| May reduce duplication and provide a stronger collective voice to Central Government. | What would the financial and rating impacts be? |
| Could help protect and strengthen regional capability if designed well. | How would local services be maintained across a large geography? |
Scenario B: Grey-Westland unitary authority with separate Buller arrangement.

| POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES | QUESTION TO TEST |
| Could reflect some existing economic, transport, tourism and service connections between Grey and Westland. | How would regional functions be delivered across Buller? |
| Creates a larger structure than current district arrangements. | Would this fragment West Coast-wide planning and advocacy? |
| Could improve coordination across shared infrastructure and services in the central and southern Coast. | How would this model support emergency management, resilience and infrastructure coordination across the whole Coast? |
Scenario C: What alternative options or local voice arrangements are we missing?
We want to know whether communities can see other options, combinations or local goverance arrangements that should be explored further.
